Tag Archives: 2nd Amendment

Political Profiteering of Parkland

It was less than an hour after recording my latest Truth Watch Radio podcast that the Democrat Party validated what I was speaking against. The Dissolute Dems had Sara Imam, a survivor of the Parkland school shooting, affix her name to a fundraising email they sent out.

Of course the Dems didn't completely show their slip in the email. They masquerade their true intentions by having you commit to vote, and once you click on the button, you must leave your name, address, and phone number. You must do that to commit. Notice, (by clinking on the picture below) the not-s0-fine print above the form (right below the sentence that begins "Be one of the first people...):


When you give out your phone number, you are agreeing "to receive call to that number from the DNC and each of the individual state parties."

What are the chances those calls and texts are going to be fundraising efforts? I'd say 100%.

Of course, the Dems will counter with a false moral equivalency by saying the NRA is fundraising off of the Parkland shootings. However, when you barely scratch the surface of their emails, it is in response to the Dems once again using a shooting tragedy to make a grab for our guns.

The NRA is being blamed for this shooting. All the NRA does is defend our 2nd Amendment Rights. The NRA is accused of owning politicians, but what does the Truth reveal? As Rush Limbaugh spoke of on his Thursday show, the NRA pales in comparison to the labor unions.

It is shameful how the Democrats are once again exploiting and implementing victimhood to hide behind their true agenda: fundraising and trampling on more of our individual liberties.

 

Below are the three pages of the email I received from the Democrat National Committee (It says there are four pages, but one printed out blank). You can decide how you feel about this whole episode.

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

Severing the Second Amendment

The latest shooting at Fort Hood, Texas has reopened the debate of whether or not service members should be allowed to carry weapons on base. Surprisingly, even some veterans are strongly opposed to such an option. Here is this veteran's two cents in the debate.

  1. Crazy people who want to kill will always find weapons. FACT: if military are allowed to carry arms, then crazy dude on Ft Hood only gets one or two shots off before he has 7-8 bullets pumped into him.
  2. We either have the unalienable right to life, which includes defending one's life, or we do not.
  3. We either have the right to keep and bear arms or we do not.
  4. We are either free citizens or we are not.
It is a national disgrace that those who swear to support and defend the US Constitution are not protected by it just because they are on a military base. If you are going to disallow citizens the right to keep and bear arms in one segment of society just because there is the possibility that a crazy person might go on the rampage, then you must disallow all segments of society.
 
Why is it when the liberals want to ban our guns when there is a shooting in a theater we staunchly defend our 2nd Amendment Rights, but if it happens on a military base, those same defenders use pretzel logic to defend denying those same rights?
 
Seems to me liberals and and opponents to arming our service members are using the same defense for denying a citizen's 2nd Amendment rights.

I will be examining this in further detail in the next issue of The Truth Newsletter. Please join The Truth Watch today to ensure you have access to this issue and all past issues. Please invite your friends, relatives, associates, and neighbors to join too.

For Liberty! 

 

DiFi’s Folly

Dave Jeffers, Founder & President of Aletheia Group L.L.C & Author of "Understanding Evangelicals: A Guide to Jesusland" shares his thoughts on Sen Dianne Feinstein's plan to go after our 2nd Amendment rights...

Please subscribe to our Aletheia Truth TV YouTube channel and share with all your friends, relatives, associates, and neighbors.